|
Reject C-38, Sikh High Priest tells Sikh MPs |
|
|
|
Toronto Star, March 28, 2005 in a blunt warning to observant Sikhs, with
possible repercussions on the Canadian political scene, Giani
Joginder Singh Vedanti
described the severe consequences facing any MP who dares to defy his directive
on "the laws of nature." Interviewed in the revered Golden Temple, where he occupies the highest
Sikh temporal seat, Vedanti disclosed for the first
time that he personally reminded six visiting Sikh-Canadian MPs during their
visit here two months ago of their religious duty to oppose gay marriage
legislation now being debated by Parliament. "The basic duty of Sikh MPs in Dressed in a traditional white kurta cotton
shirt and maroon turban, Vedanti grew impassioned
as he described his occasionally tension-filled encounter with the visiting
MPs last January on the eve of Prime Minister Paul Martin's official visit to
nearby In bypassing "I told them about Sikh teachings and how Sikhs should come forward
to protect these Sikh tenets," said Vedanti,
acting as the Jathedar Akal
Takht — the highest Sikh authority. "The Sikh religion would never accept such MPs. Nobody would support
such a person having such dirty thoughts in their mind because it is against
the Sikh religion and the Sikh code of conduct and totally against the laws
of nature." Sikhs around the world must maintain fidelity to these religious
teachings, he argued, and no politician is exempt. Anyone who disobeys his
directive risks the wrath of all Sikhs. "Most of the Sikh community would resent them, and the majority of
the Sikh population living in Gesturing sharply with his hands, Vedanti
singled out rookie Liberal MP Navdeep Bains (Mississauga-Brampton South) for daring to disagree
with him during their meeting last January. "There was one Sikh MP who didn't agree," he recalled, citing Bains by name. The other visiting MPs "preferred to remain silent on this
issue" and merely listened respectfully to the high priest's message. Vedanti's words were echoed yesterday by Manjit Singh Kalkatta, another
highly respected Sikh preacher who sits on the governing body of the Kalkatta, a former "We expect from every practising Sikh, whether he is a member of a
legislative assembly or Parliament, that he would abide by
his faith," Kalkatta said. If not, he cautioned, "it might be that they are censured." He described how Bains made his views known and
was subjected to strong pressure to amend his views or face the consequences.
"I was successful in putting a message to him that he should not
espouse this cause publicly, as the Sikh people would reject that and he
would lose his own people's support. He is a baptized Sikh, and must adhere
to the principles of his religion." Kalkatta noted approvingly that Liberal MP Gurbax Malhi (Bramalea-Gore-Malton) stated his opposition to same-sex
marriage, but expressed dissatisfaction that fellow Liberal Ruby Dhalla (Brampton-Springdale) was non-committal during her
visit. "The lady MP (Dhalla) she abstained from
saying anything" during the discussions in Dhalla is believed to be leaning toward the bill
but has said she will consult her constituents. Health Minister Ujjal Dosanjh, also a Liberal,
supports the legislation. Conservative MPs Gurmant Grewal (Newton-North Delta) and his wife Nina Grewal (Fleetwood-Port Kells)
are known to oppose it. Parliament is expected to have a free vote on the same-sex marriage issue,
except for cabinet ministers who must support the bill. But the bottom line
is that every vote will be closely watched by Sikh religious figures here and
in "The advice given by the highest Sikh temporal authority to every
Sikh is saying that it is unnatural and ungodly, and the Sikh religion cannot
support it. When the appeal is made to every Sikh from the highest authority,
then MPs come under the same thing." |